The other day we paid a visit to the Basilica of St Paul "outside the walls" of the old Roman City. ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Basilica_of_Saint_Paul_Outside_the_Walls)
Here is where St Paul was buried, his tomb is regarded to be directly under the main altar. St Paul is my patron saint and I have a special devotion to him. He was a lawyer who was zealous in the letter of the law and believed that by complete adherence to the religious law of his time as interpreted by the legalistic establishment of his time, one was righteous. In this overzealousness Paul set about persecuting this new group of disciples of a man called Jesus, whom he misguidedly believed to be corrupting the true worship of God. On his way to damascus to capture more of these people later to be known as Christians, he was struck to the ground by an unseen force and saw a vision of blinding light. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Caravaggio-The_Conversion_on_the_Way_to_Damascus.jpg )
He heard a voice which he later realised was Jesus saying 'saul, saul why do you persecute me?' . He realised with horror that his blind obedience to the rigid and inflexible letter of the law had actually led him to go against God's will revealed in and through Jesus God the son. From then on Paul became the most bold of all disciples fiercely proclaiming the love of Jesus and the life of discipleship in The Holy Spirit. Paul knowingly warned about reliance on the letter of the law- it cannot save, only Jesus and his grace does that. He spoke graciously about the freedom and responsibility that came from a new law - that written by the Spirit upon our hearts.
I have always been deeply impressed by Pauls writings and his constant message to us. I have in some small way known the meaning of putting God's spirit before legalism, having come myself from legal training at university. I have never seen visions but at times in my life I have been 'spiritually knocked off my horse' in realisation that Jesus does not desire rules and regulations but grace and Spirit, and above all love. I love having Paul as my patron saint.
I have wanted to visit this basilica the last two times I was in Rome but circumstances prevented me. I was content though because I always believed that one day I would return and visit this place. That day finally came on October 1st and it lived up to expectations. It was not just the absolute beauty of the building, it was not only the fact that something really special and joyful seemed to bouy up our whole group as we took a tour through this church, celebrated Mass at the Martyrs chapel there and got to pray and the newlyexcavated front of the tomb of Paul in front of the main altar.
Ironically the celebrant of the mass, which we all concelebrated here did not mention St paul once! Ha ha. No matter- all around us and in fact all around Rome and the world we can see and experience reminders of this great Apostle to the Gentiles.
There was another unexpected surprise awaiting me here though. I am speaking about Saint Thérèse of Liseux, not only a very popular saint but since 1997 the church has declared her a 'doctor of the church' given the significance of her writing and influence. It was her feast day on the day of our visit to St Pauls and the mass and homily made several significant and meaningful mentions of her and her spiritual writings. For some time I had been feeling drawn to read more on her life and writing and had not yet done so, and so here I was at St Pauls hearing more about her than my patron. It ended up being a perfect if unexpected combination. It was a bit like going to a dinner party to see a longtime friend and finding not only them but also another unexpected extra guest who has also been invited, and then striking up a new level of friendship with the guest. That is what it felt like as I reflected not only on Paul but also Therese as I experienced this tour.
I had not realised until I went and found her works that Thérèse had an enormous respect for and quoted st pauls words often. Thérèse had a special sense of mission to pray for and spiritually sustain in prayer priests. She particularly wanted to pray for missionaries and since she was too ill to be a missionary herself, she would be a spiritual missionary by offering her prayers and everyday actions to God as an act of love whichshe trusted would bear enormous fruit in the lives and ministry of others. It was later revealed that this turned out to be more effective in the lives of countless people than we could have imagined. St Thérèse also lived St Pauls words to the full- "if I had faith so as to move mountains but did not have love I am nothing whatsoever." Therese, wanting to be missionary, teacher, martyr, priest, warrior for Christ and so much more finally realised in prayer that she was called to be all of these (in a sense) by finidng her vocation to be 'love in the very heart of the church' thus being united in faith so closely to God who is love until she positively exuded love to anyone she met or wrote to or prayed for.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Th%C3%A9r%C3%A8se_de_Lisieux
Sorry to be so gushing about this but I cannot describe effectively what an impact this day and following days have had on me as i reflected on these things and went and read as much as I could on this saint . Even though some of her words and expressions are firmly couched in terms of piety of the 19th century, her thought is still relevant and is in fact essentially timeless. I had known previously and felt particularly attracted to her concept of 'the little way of holiness' which fits with one of my favourite themes of making the events, chores and challenges of our everyday life and action the very substance of our sanctification and holiness of daily life. I believe that even the most mundane of chores if done with love is connecting us to the love and transforming grace of God, which cannot fail to produce enormous fruitfulness even if we don't always see it.
Occasionally Thérèse and her writing has been accused of being overly sentimental or pietistic. However again I was amazed to read that in the last 18 months of her life (and her death from tuberculosis was reportedly dreadfully protracted and horrific right up to the end) she experienced no consolation and a kind of endless dark night of the soul. But this ongoing sense of desolation reminded her that even Jesus felt no consolation on the cross and even cried out "My God, My God, why have you abandoned me". For her critics, not that she was trying to justify herself, Thérèse did not equate discipleship of Jesus or closeness to God with feelings of warmth, consolation or comfort. A closer look reveals a person who held on in trust through times of doubt and emptiness, and used these times to show love, kindness and graciousness to others when she could have been forgiven for 'biting people's heads off' with irritation because of her illness and pain.
This is all a long way of saying that this visit to St Pauls opened my eyes even wider and was a deeply moving moment of renewal for me. We went out in the cloister garden after mass at St Paul's and there in the garden were a couple of the most beautiful roses in full bloom. What a wonderful day.
It appears that Paul has once again been knocked flat off his horse. It was certainly not a bad feeling!
In that chapel where we had mass was an ancient crucifix where it is believed a saint prayed and the head of Jesus on the crucifix turned toward her. Interestingly the head does seem at a very odd and unnatural angle to the body!
One last amausing thing. As we were going into the sacristy of the Basilica of st paul's, to vest for mass, I got an unexpected surprise. A cute little puppy dog came bounding out of the sacristy ( I have never seen a dog in a basilica before - it apparently belonged to the sacristan). It bounded up and came over for a pat. It was very cute. I laughed and said to it ' st Francis says to say hello!' I joked with the other priests "maybe this is the hound of heaven?"
Another stunning feature of this church is its windows. They appear to be made of a kind of opaque golden glass but amazingly they are actually made of highly polished, very thin and translucent stone - alabaster - giving a pleasing golden light to the inside.
It was an excellent day and I have a lot of photos of my visit on my website www.mysteriousthree.com
++++++
this week has been a free week for traveling. "Some of our group went on an optional tour to the Holy Land but I stayed home in Rome to wander about, rest, I have a small cold, and read up on Thérèse and other reflective books. One day I hope to go to the Holy Lands but I do not feel the time is right.
I did get to go to Saint Anselms University, San Anselmos, a benedictine college and monastery. It is beautiful. http://www.santanselmo.org/images/dott_hc_mons_valenziano/index.htm
I got to have lunch with one of the staff and also met a young Jesuit from Sydney who was completing a thesis on images of Mary in the Chinese church. I mentioned that I had been to China many times and my brother Ben lived there.
I got invited to visit there after a lecturer from San Anselmo did a class for us at our college. I got to talking with him in the break and mentioned that my uncle Clem studied at this college in the sixties. This college tends to specialise in aspects of Liturgy. Also Fr Clem took me to visit this place (Anselmos) and we got to concelebrate with the community of monks when I was here with him in 1999. It was a wonderful day. I had lunch with the community, got a tour of the chapel and cloister and the excellent library. I also got to see and talk about the new Roman Missal (sacramentary) that was issued in 2002. I saw a latin version of it, it is still being carefully translated into English but we don't know how long this process of translating, review, episcopal and Vatican approval will take. Nothing secret and confidential here though, anyone can buy a latin version in Rome now, if they can read it, but my Latin is fairly basic. I was shown some of the changes that the New Missal for the mass will make. They are not huge, there are clarifications of ambiguities, changes of a few words, a simplification of the options in the penitential rite and things like this. YOu may have heard of various controversies arising about early confidential drafts of the translation to English of this latin text but really I suspect that speculation arising from leaked drafts is full of misunderstanding and is probably unhelpful. I just commented, well when it comes out I will take the view that 'just give it to us and I will implement it' I don't believe in causing a fuss and jumping up and down, the liturgy is bigger than one person, certainly bigger than me and my whims.
If you are wanting to read a bit more about the updated roman missal we have a foretaste of it because the introductory General instruction to the 2002 Edition has been translated into English but has not fully been implemented everywhere until different bishops conferences around the world adopt it. It is a complex and consultative process.
The new english version of the missal could possibly still be years off being fully issued. Basically they are aiming at a translation that is very faithful to the latin text version, simple, clear, unambiguous. It will also focus on preserving ancient versions of the oepning and closing prayers and deleting those wordy alternative opening prayers that were basically created anew for the previous edition. Some of the translations of the present opening and closing prayers of the mass (whilst not wrong) are very loose and general echoes of what the actual original text is saying so this new version aims to be more precise and literal to the text. Also the new translation is apparently open to the concept that as well as our 'everyday' english there is room for using words that are more 'formal' more liturgical and distinct from casual speech so as to highlight some aspects of the special and sacramental nature of liturgy. This is why we might not use words such as 'hallowed' in everyday speech -probaby we would use the word 'holy' in daily speech, but the church is suggesting that more this more formal and less everyday vocabulary could still be fitting in a liturgical setting to convey the mystery and majesty of what is happening. At least that is my take on some of the aspects under consideration, but it won't be wholly foreign to us, it seems to be structurally very recognisable as the forms we have become used to.
I got to pop into a church just near the Anselmo college. This church is a 4th century church called Santa Sabina.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Santa_Sabina It is an excellent and untainted version of any early Christian Basilica, simple, uncluttered with beautiful vertical lines, classic columns and a simple timber ceiling with stars painted on it. The floors are of geometic patterns. A paneled door (5th century) in the side portico outside features on the top left of the door the earliest depictions of the crucifix . Prior to this depiction which became popular after this, the shame and horror of the crucifixion was too recent, to scandalous too real a possibility of being their fate too, so images of a fish or a jewelled victory cross etc were common. By the 5th century, Christianity was legal and the church was now more settled in its public position and appeared to need to remind itself of the reality of Christs cross and suffering F before this time suffering and martyrdom were so real they needed no reminding but rather needed strength to remember the glory they were called to and promised.
Cheers and I hope this reflection has been interesting. I enjoyed my visit.
Paul